<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Economic-Development on Werk Space</title>
    <link>/tags/economic-development/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Economic-Development on Werk Space</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 23:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/economic-development/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Data Centers Should Pay Their Way, and Wisconsin Should Set the Pace</title>
      <link>/policy/energy/pay-their-way-set-the-pace/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/policy/energy/pay-their-way-set-the-pace/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This column first ran at &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.wispolitics.com/2026/gary-dalton-data-centers-should-pay-their-way-and-wisconsin-should-set-the-pace/&#34;&gt;WisOpinion&lt;/a&gt; on August 31, 2026. My own comment in the We Energies rate case, docket 5-UR-112, is &lt;a href=&#34;https://apps.psc.wi.gov/ERF/ERFview/viewdoc.aspx?docid=606632&#34;&gt;on the record&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s data center campus in Mount Pleasant sits on ground assembled for Foxconn. The two projects share the footprint yet differ. Foxconn was subsidy-led: Wisconsin committed billions in refundable tax credits for the promise of jobs and additional investment. The state&amp;rsquo;s $2.85 billion tax-credit commitment was scaled back to $80 million once it was clear those jobs were not coming. Microsoft purchased the footprint and deployed its own capital. Its own incentive package is modest by comparison, capped at $5 million a year. Its first building is already operational.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
